Handgun records are open records; keep it that way

UPDATE: The Legislature in April 2013 passed, and the governor signed, changes to the law to make confidential information related to handgun carry permits. The law does allow for a person or entity to request the state department of safety to search its handgun permit holder database to determine if a particular person who would be ineligible for a handgun permit because of a conviction, order of protection or some other reason, possesses a permit anyway. It also allows for release of statistical reports about handgun permits, such as the number of permits by age, gender, zip code. The new confidentiality provisions went into effect April 30, 2013.

 

April 5, 2013

The handgun carry permit registry maintained by the state Department of Safety has been open for public review since 1996 without any proof that public access has endangered any registrant.

However, some gun owners protest that the open records violate their privacy and the Legislature is debating a bill to close general access to the registryCZ_2075_RAMI_P

What privacy issue do they mean?

Thousands of firearms are purchased every year in Tennessee, yet the only weapons that are registered in the state database are for the privilege of carrying handguns openly or concealed in public.  The database does not include the many thousands of other handguns, shotguns and rifles that citizens have a right to maintain in the privacy of their homes without registration.

This is not about Second Amendment rights. It is about personal privilege on one narrow issue involving weapons.

Some pro-gun advocates hold the strong belief that we would all be safer if everyone carried a weapon. But I doubt that the majority of Tennesseans who do not have carry permits agree or they would have signed up for permits to carry weapons in public.

In fact, many believe that the presence of a private citizen carrying a handgun in a public place can provoke extreme unease to the extent that anyone unarmed may feel threatened. The ancient Greeks would not allow the carrying of spears and swords inside the walls of their city states for that very reason. Sheriffs and marshals in our own frontier towns often required visitors leave their six-shooters at the jail.

Today in Tennessee, nearly 400,000 citizens have permits to carry handguns in public. But how do the rest of the citizens of the state know if anyone carrying a handgun actually has a permit to carry that weapon? Without access to the database, they cannot know for certain.

Earlier this year, a review by The Associated Press of suspended and revoked gun carry permits found that 4,332 people had lost their carry permits over the past five years. Nineteen percent lost their permits permanently while the rest were suspended temporarily.

Legislation to close the registry faces one final vote in the Senate next week. It would still allow citizens the limited ability to check people facing felony charges to see if they hold permits to carry handguns. But it would not allow a search for such information for people on misdemeanor charges such as State Rep. Curry Todd, whose permit was suspended after he pleaded guilty to DUI in January.

The public registry was created 17 years ago after the public learned that handgun permits were sometimes given secretly as political favors by local sheriffs. The state of Tennessee then decided that the public welfare required that the state regulate the possession of firearms in public.

It is still in the best interest of the people of Tennessee that public access to the database continue for the sake of transparency and open government.

The admonition of the late Carl A. Jones, publisher of the Johnson City Press, rings as true today as it did when it became the slogan of the newspaper decades ago: “What the people don’t know will hurt them.”

One thought on “Handgun records are open records; keep it that way

  1. Douglas

    I have fired expert on the M14, the M2 canbrie, the M1911A1, the Colt .38 and the Browning HiPower. Parenthetically, I agree with Ghost Dansing about that weapon. Only got sharpshooter with the M1. I’ve also fired the BAR, the .30 and .50 MGs, as well as the Thompson. To disagree with MB here, the Thompson doesn’t give me chills: it gives me warm and fuzzies. It was my preferred weapon in Vietnam and I’d love to have one now.I am not a gun lover, nor am I a target shooter. I do not collect them, nor do I get a stiffy thinking about them. I am, however, a gun owner and an unhesitant gun user in the right circumstances. I’m also responsible enough that no sane government would ever have a problem with me owning weapons. I believe I’m the sort of guy that the framers of the Constitution were thinking of. Not an NRA member, not a gun collector, none of that, just a trained “militia” member prepared to take up arms to defend family and the state. I’m also the guy who, although he’s a so-called liberal on most every count, gives fits to the gun-outlawing community that thinks only active soldiers and cops should have guns. I think our Founders were very well aware of that argument when they wrote the Constitution. I also think our Founders were a lot smarter than most of today’s politicians. I have little problem with their 219-year-old document. Every study I’ve seen that looks at what happens to violent crimes against persons seems to indicate that such crimes decline precipitously in those states that’ve passed concealed carry legislation. I got a chuckle out of MB’s description of the gun control folks during the King riots. That’s kind of in line with my beliefs about these people: they have no problem with taking care of criminals. They just don’t want to get their own hands dirty. They want to rely on the magical, mysterious government to somehow keep them safe. It’s not going to happen. They’re well-meaning fools, close cousins to what Soviet KGB officers termed “useful idiots” in the Western democracies.

Comments are closed.